The Future of Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence: Towards Ethical Innovation across Sectors

Authors

  • Ruchi Lal School of Law, Manav Rachna University, Faridabad, Haryana, India. Author
  • Superna Venaik School of Law, Manav Rachna University, Faridabad, Haryana, India. Author

Keywords:

Human Rights, Artificial Intelligence, Governance, Regulations

Abstract

Every facet of what it means to be human is impacted by Artificial Intelligence (AI). Being Artificial refers to something created or which is manufactured via humans as opposed to existing naturally. Whereas, Intelligence is the ability to absorb, apply knowledge or skills. AI algorithms can be implemented to analyze huge amounts of data in real time, thereby identifying patterns, anomalies, or potential threats that might evade traditional signature-based detection systems. AI's working scope becomes limited, generative, strong to reactive robots, with limited memory, theory of mind, or self-awareness, as per capability or functionality. With the vision of India’s Viksit Bharat by 2047, aspiration is Artificial Intelligence for all with inclusion, sustainability and resilience. As AI has potential to benefit or can affect human rights including freedom of speech & expression, thought, assembly, association, mobility, privacy and data protection, education, health, employment etc. This conclusion shall examine the intersection of AI’s development through law, which can promote human-centric innovation in diverse sectors. This shall be an attempt to highlight the ethical standards along legal protection guaranteed towards human rights. The European Union’s AI Act and Indian regulations shall address the questions on how innovation can be balanced in protective mechanisms, whose accountability can be finalized and how its human-centric principles, such as transparency and fairness, can be addressed altogether. The primary regulatory framework for digital platforms is the Information Technology Act of 2000. In the event that intermediaries fail to imitate data transmission, select recipient of the data, or modify it, Section 79 provides them legal immunity for unlawful third-party content. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act of 2023 ensures data security or looks at content authentication, which is the process of determining whether any information was created or altered by an AI system.

References

[1] Bilton, N, American Journalist Commentary on Artificial Intelligence Upheavals. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/by/nick-bilton; Last accessed on 1st March, 2026.

[2] International Association of Privacy Professionals, Artificial Intelligence Glossary- “A broad term used to describe a designed system that uses various computational techniques to perform or automate tasks. This can include- techniques such as machine learning, in which machines learn from the experience, adjusting to new input data and potentially performing tasks previously performed by humans. Available at https://iapp.org/resources/glossary/; Last accessed on 21st March, 2026.

[3] Nishith Desai (2018), “The Future is here: Artificial Intelligence and Robotics”, NDA; Available at Nishith Desai Associates; Available at https://www.nishithdesai.com/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Research_Papers/Artificial_Intelligence_and_Robotics.pdf; Last accessed on 14th April, 2026.

[4] Sood A.K., (2025, November 5) India AI Governance Guidelines- Enabling Safe and Trusted AI Innovation, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India.

[5] Pei Wang, “What Do Mean by “AI”? 171(1) Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 362-373 (2008).

[6] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) Vs. Union of India AIR 2017 SC 4161.

[7] PEE PEE Publisher and Distributors(P) Ltd. Vs. Neena Khanna (2009) 40 PTC 515.

[8] Future of Work Report: 2026; Generative AI: Tool, Colleague or Liability? LexisNexis; Report (2026, April 11).

[9] Anivar A. Aravind Vs. Ministry of Home Affairs (2021) 2 AKR 435.

[10] Queen Mary University of London (2025 January, 23) Creative Industry Workers feel job worth and security under threat from AI. Available at https://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/news/2025/queen-mary-news/pr/creative-industry-workers-feel-job-worth-and-security-under-threat-from-ai-.html; Last accessed on 2nd April, 2026.

[11] Agniezka Krainska (2020, May 10). “Legal Personality and Artificial Intelligence”, NEWTEC LA.

[12] H.T. Tavani(1998), Ethics and Technology: Ethical Issues in an Age of Communication Technology and Information Technology 35 (Wiley, Dartmouth, 1st Edn. 1998).

[13] Burhan Rashid Hussein, Chongomweru Halimu & Muhammad Tariq Siddique (2020), “The Future of Artificial Intelligence and its Social, Economic and Ethical Consequences” 24, International Conference Adv. Comput. Technol, Proc- 17-10.

[14] Bartz Vs. Anthropic PBC Case 3:24-cv-05417-WHA (N.D.Ca), Available at https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68923439/bartz-v-anthropic-pbc/; Last accessed on 24th March, 2026.

[15] Heather Murphy (2017, January 9), “Why Stanford Researchers Tried to Create a “Gaydar Machine”, The New York Times. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/topic/journal-of-personality-and-social-psychology; Last accessed on 12th March 2026.

[16] Andrew Ng., (2016, September 17), “What Artificial Intelligence Can and Can’t Do Right Now”, Harvard Business Review Online.Available at https://hbr.org/2016/11/what-artificial-intelligence-can-and-cant-do-right-now; Last accessed on 15th March 2026.

[17] State Vs. Loomis, 881 N.W. 2d 749 (Wis. 2016).

[18] Avi Feller, Emma Pierson, Sam Corbett- Davies and Sharad Goel, “A computer programme used for bail and sentencing decisions was labeled biased against blacks. It’s actually not that clear” The Washington post. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/10/17/can-an-algorithm-be-racist-our-analysis-is-more-cautious-than-propublicas/; Last accessed on 14th April, 2026.

[19] Supra 4- India AI Governance Guidelines- Enabling Safe and Trusted AI Innovation, Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India.

[20] M.A.N.A.V- Indian PM Narendra Modi’s Human Centric AI Odyssey; Press Information Bureau; (2026, February 19). Available at https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetailm.aspx?PRID=2230282&reg=3&lang=1; Last accessed on 14th April, 20266.

[21] J. Burrell, “How the Machine “Thinks”: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms” (2016) Big Data & Society, 3, 1-12. Available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2053951715622512; Last accessed on 19th March, 2026.

[22] Tom. B. Brown, Language Models are Few Short Learners, Arxiv; Eg- OpenAI has stated that it has used publicly accessible datasets such as Common Crawl, WebText2 and Wikipedia for training ChatGPT-3.

[23] Reisner, A., (2025, March 25). The Unbelievable Scale of AI’s Pirated Books problem. The Atlantic and RettighedsAlliancen. Report on pirated content used in the training of generative AI. Available at https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/03/libgen-meta-openai/682093/; Last accessed on 2nd April, 2026.

[24] Bharat AI Kosh- National Repository to provide raw materials for the next generation of Indian AI; Available at aikosh.indiaai.gov.in; Last accessed on 2nd April, 2026.

[25] Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (2025) MeitY Issues - India AI Governance Guidelines 2025- a comprehensive framework to ensure the safe, trusted and inclusive development of Artificial Intelligence in India available at anevagi.com; Last accessed on 11th April, 2026.

[26] Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act; Published in the Official Journal of EU on 12 July 2024 and entered into force on 1st August 2024.

[27] Olmstead Vs. United States 277 US 438 (1928), 478.

[28] Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India, Vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal (2020) 5 SCC 481.

[29] From Bias to Surveillance: Challenges to Privacy and Equality in India’s Digital Future, ICREP Journal; Volume 4 Issue III, Year 2025.

[30] Tuomas Sorjamaa, (2016) I, Author-Authorship and Copyright in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.

[31] Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, Art. 9(1971). World Intellectual Property Organization (1971). Available at https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne/; Last accessed on 1st March, 2026.

[32] Paulius Cerka, Jurgita Grigiene, GintareSirbikyt; (2015) Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence; Computer Law & Security Review 31(3) 376-389.

[33] Infopaq International A/S Vs. Danske Dagblades Forening (2009); Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content /EN/TXT/?uri=celx.62008CJ0005; Last accessed on 1st March 2026.

[34] Will Lawyers-Judges replace artificial intelligence?; Available at https://www.livelaw.in/will-lawyers-judges-replaced-artificial intelligence-ai/; Last accessed on 24th March, 2026.

[35] India AI Mission, “AI Kosh”, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology (“MeitY”, Government of India, Available at https://aikoshindiaai.gov.in/home; Last accessed on 18th March, 2026.

[36] Jaswinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab CRM-M-22496-2022; Order dt. 27-03-2026.

[37] Hibaq Farah, (2023, September 15) “Court of Appeal Judge Praises “Jolly Useful” ChatGPT after asking it for Legal Summary,” The Guardian.

[38] Luke Taylor, (2023, February 3) “Columbian Judge Says he used ChatGPT in Ruling” The Guardian.

[39] The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation Art.22, Available at https://gdpr-info.edu/art-22-gdpr/; Last accessed on 11th March, 2026.

[40] Christian Louboutin SAS Vs. M/s The Shoe Boutique 2017 SCC OnLine Del 12173.

[41] ANI Vs. OpenAI & Ors Delhi High Court, pending 2025-2026.

[42] Can AI train on digital news content? Court reserves verdict in ANI Vs. OpenAI Case (2026, April 1); India Today News Epaper; Available at https://www.indiatoday.in/india/law-news/story/ani-openai-delhi-hc-verdict-ai-training-news-content-2698452-2026-04-01; Last accessed on 24th March, 2026.

[43] Chaudhry, U., Borda, A, “Creative Grey Zones: Copyright in the Age of Hybridity”, The Alan Turing Institute.

[44] Goold, P.R. & Simon, D.A. (2024). On Copyright Utilitarianism. Indiana Law Journal, 99(3) Article 2. Available at https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol99/iss3/2; Last accessed on 14th April, 2026.

[45] Anand A. (2023, October 12), “Supreme Court, IIT Madras Sign MoU to enable Digital Transformation of Judiciary” Indian Today. Available at https://www.indiatoday.in.; Last accessed on 23rd March, 2026.

Published

2026-09-30